Archive for the ‘Regulation’ Category

Atypical APIs

Thursday, December 18th, 2008

The Commission and the EMEA have recognised that for a small number of medicinal products the primary use of the active substance is not in a medicinal product and the producer may therefore not be aiming to meet the specific requirements of pharmaceutical customers that represent an insignificant volume of business. This issue has been the subject of discussions between the Commission/EMEA and various industry groups for some time. In September 2008 the EMEA issued the following advice on the Q&A section of their website on how to proceed when dealing with an ‘atypical’ active:

“Alternative sources should normally be sought but in exceptional circumstances the manufacturing authorisation holder should assess and document to which extent GMP is complied with and provide a risk-based justification for the acceptance of any derogation. The declaration provided by the Qualified Person should set out in detail the basis for declaring that the standards applied provide the same level of assurance as GMP. EMEA will collect experience with this approach which can be used as a basis for discussion on related amendments to guidelines in the future.”

This is a pragmatic solution that has generally been welcomed by industry.

GMP–Too much of a good thing!

Thursday, October 16th, 2008

Bob Pietrowski

My article in the last Journal on why EUGMP expectations are now the toughest in the world drew numerous emails from readers – most notably from readers in the US who felt that I was criticising the FDA and USGMP standards!

Let me be perfectly clear. I draw absolutely no pride from my belief that EUGMP requirements are tougher than those of FDA – far from it. I believe that Regulatorsa ll over the world, but particularly in parts of the EU, are in danger of pursuing higher levels of GMP for GMP’s sake, and not for the benefit of the patient. Recent initiatives through ICH represent a welcome attempt to bring everyone’s attention back to what is really important.

Just because GMP requirements are getting tougher, it doesn’t mean that they are getting better or that patients are being better protected.